Sitewide Search
Helpful Information
- Liberating the NHS (1)
- Mr. Lansley-Points to Consider (11)
- Press Releases (12)
- Meetings (2)
- Self Help Groups (1)
- Disabilites (1)
- NHS Whistleblowers (3)
- NHS Authorities (2)
- NHS Managers (2)
- NHS Advocacy (1)
- NHS Informative Websites (1)
- Access Medical Records (1)
- GMC - General Medical Council (1)
- Prison Healthcare (1)
- Patient Safety (2)
- Abuse by Health and Care Workers (2)
- Consent Documents (2)
- DNAR's (4)
- Resuscitation (3)
- NHS Confidentiality (3)
- Public Inquiries (4)
Articles
- RSS Feed

- 13 Feb 2012
My Notes - Joanna Slater's Press Release - 11 Jul 2011
CHRE say NHS Managers let patients down - 22 May 2011
Your Stories Needed - 14 Feb 2011
The Big Opt Out - 16 Dec 2010
Duty of Candour Petition - 12 Nov 2010
Mid Staffs is Not an Isolated Case - 6 Nov 2010
Health Select Committee Examines Complaints System - More >>>
More Info
Mid Staffs is Not an Isolated Caseposted on 12 November 2010 | posted in Public InquiriesThe NHS Reform Group have submitted the following to the Mid Staffs Public Inquiry and the Health Select Committee, both of whom are examining the NHS Complaints Procedure. ![]() We are pleased that the Mid Staffs Public Inquiry is now fully underway and we congratulate Ms. Julie Bailey and the rest of Cure the NHS who have worked extremely hard for this to happen. We are saddened though that the Department of Health issued a statement recently saying that Mid Staffs was an isolated case and saddened that this hospital, which is supposed to be under the guidance of one of the 'top" NHS and Department of Health Officials, Antony Sumara, is still making mistakes with todays news of the deaths of baby boy twins due to a reported mal administration of drugs: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/nov/11/twins-killed-mistake-inquiry-hospital It has been said, according to the chairman of the public inquiry into the scandal, that patients suffered and died unnecessarily during a disaster in hospital care because NHS bosses and watchdogs failed to step in. But is anything going to change at Mid Staffs and are the NHS bosses and watchdogs still failing to step in elsewhere? The NHS Reform Group has 162 members that are from all parts of the UK. Each member has experienced the same NHS poor service that is now being highlighted by the Mid Staffs Public Inquiry. Each member has suffered when the NHS bosses and watchdogs use the same techniques to detract from their poor care. Our members have fought solitary battles to achieve Justice - but it is just not there. There are the placating letters sent from the Hospital to say that 'your case is extremely rare and we can assure you that nothing like this will happen again'. Then when our members just wouldn't go away but went onto the next step of the NHS Complaints ladder, they would receive another placating letter to say that the Trust had investigated and so there is nothing more to be done. Then when our members still just wouldn't go away, the NMC, or GMC or CQC step in as the 'NHS heavies" and say that the Trust has addressed their concerns and 'no further action will be taken'. Then when our members have approached the 'Final Stage" of the NHS Complaints procedure, the Healthcare Ombudsman, who only investigated 356 cases out of more than 22.000 - our members still didn't get Justice as their cases were NOT investigated. The Healthcare Ombudsman wrote effortlessly 'nothing to investigate'. One of our members received one of these 'template' letters from the Healthcare Ombudsman, but still did not go away and now the Police are investigating his case under the direction of the Coroner and the GMC are conducting a Stream 1 investigation. Did the Healthcare Ombudsman make a mistake or was she just trying her luck to try to stop our member getting justice? All of these supposed regulatory bodies use various techniques to try to stop complainants, such as writing to say 'we will not be responding to any more of your communications" or they label you as a 'vexatious complainant' as a way of stopping you from getting answers. If by chance, through perserverance, you do get one of the NHS Regulatory Bodies to accept that there have been mistakes made and serious ones at that, they use a very clever sentence to make sure they do not have to bring one of their members before a Court 'due to the passage of time" (we won't be doing anything). A PALS worker has given an insight to the NHS Complaints Procedure: http://www.nhsreformgroup.com/NHS-Complaints-Procedure-Exposed-by-NHS-Complaints-Handler/44.htm and so has a Former Chair of a PCT: http://www.nhsreformgroup.com/Former-PCT-Chair-States-NHS-Complaints-Procedures-Corrupt/47.htm In August 2009 the CQC cited 7 NHS Trusts as having High Unexpected Death rates: Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals trust, Share this blog entry: |
|



